Okay, I'll do a couple of posts on this, first questioning the prohibitive pricing and then moving on to what I would do. So the prohibitive pricing, I can see why it is an appealing thought and it is something that the UK government has pursued as well, but with a little less gusto than in Australia. My objection to it has a number of facets.
The first being the socioeconomic demographics of those that do choose to smoke. It is those from the most deprived areas, with the most depressing outlook on life, with the least opportunities that are most likely to smoke and also smoke more cigarettes than those from more privileged backgrounds. Just think about that for a moment. In the UK, what we are doing in pursuing this policy is increasing the burden of tax on those least equipped to absorb it. Now here we probably see this from a different angle, in that we are largely currently succeeding in the path of quitting, but let's not lose our humanity. There is a perverse and unnecessary cruelty in a legal, highly addictive product further imprisoning in poverty those with the bleakest economic outlook.
Second objection. Lying, cheating, selfish, morally bankrupt arseholes who chase the biggest profit they can make and to hell with the human cost.
Yes we are talking about too much of big business. Certainly we are talking about the tobacco companies. But, and its a big one, we are also talking about organized crime. At the end of the day I know that I want executives that are answerable to legislators rather than organized crime, supplying our (in the loosest sense) poison of choice. It is estimated in the UK that 20% of cigarettes are bought on the black market. You think the standard poison we willingly inhaled into our lungs is evil, you don't want to know just how much more deadly the black market stuff is. It is counter intuitive at a time where governments are seeing sense and loosening controls on some substances to create an additional environment where organized crime can thrive.
Last objection and it is just repeating a really good point JetBlack made previously. Careful what you wish for, rights being restricted, even if those are ones that we choose not to avail ourselves of, is a bad thing. What comes next and when will governments get to something you do care about?